Nike 10k by mcneilmahon at Garmin Connect – Player.
So the big day arrived and we managed to arrive at the finish line in one piece and happy with our days work. We arrived downtown early so were close to the start line when the race started, which meant everyone around me was running noticeably faster than my body was intending to go.
The occasion and my mind had other ideas though and I got carried along the early kilometres at under a 6min/km pace, which I haven’t run since before my right knee injury if I remember rightly.
When I saw I was running at 103% heart rate at about 4k, I tried to slow down a bit, but I was judging myself by the runners around me rather than my watch which seemed to be going haywire. Most times I looked at it it said I was doing 7 or nearly 8min/km, but when the km lap time came round I was under 6 again. I just tried to stay with the slowest person near me for a while before they trotted off into the distance and I chose a new hare.
Mer had gone off ahead of me after I’d sprinted to catch up with her after the first water station and then she got stopped by a diabetic on Corrientes who was about to faint. Cost her two or three minutes as she had to help her while someone went to buy her a coke. Apparently she waved at me but I never saw her, lucky for me because if I’d stopped my knees would have swollen up and not let me start again.
I can understand the poor diabetic’s problem though, Corrientes was a killer. The afternoon sun was beating down on the back of heads and there was nowhere to hide. There were three or four long stretches of sun which really went to my head, thankfully the legs never gave up. The last three kilometres were pure mind and mantra and I was dead on my feet crossing the line, but very pleased with 1:02:41 for the race and 1:00:58 for my own 10km it seems according to the trusty old Garmin. Looking at the map shows the problems I was having headwise since I was all over the shop – lots of squiggles. Actually it seems I kept up the sub one hour pace through Corrientes but once I got to the Gatorade drinking station and had a little walk while I took some on I couldn’t pick the pace up again since it was sunny all the way home.
An excellent result all the same and brings hope that on a cooler day and without this annoying chest cough I may get back under an hour for 10k, even with two dodgy knees rather than one. Raring to go for another race now, but not much left between now and the end of the year, so the aim must be to keep in shape over Christmas and get ready for a fuller running season next year, still taking it easy and stirring clear of injury.
Looking at the results now seems I came in 5730 out of 15 000 which is pretty flattering since it makes it sound like I’m almost in the top third of runners who go in for these street races. What it really shows is how close to the start line we were when we took off, cos I bet there were plenty of people that finished with a slower official time but better net time. Great to see I was right on pace at 5km, that could be another short term training challenge perhaps, to run 5km under 30mins. But take it easy Neil!
If you ever wanted to see me being tortured and under duress, you can watch me cross the finish line here. I appear top right at about 01:03:15 and make my way across the line and the screen to the bottom right hand corner by 01:03:28. Sun makes it look like I’ve got blonde hair, but I’m definitely in pain and wobbling all over the place…
Comment on Scott Thornbury’s blog post ‘G is for Gist’
30 11 2011Hi all,
Fascinating reading throughout and I find particular resonance in Wily, Simon and Rob’s posts.
The related question that I’ve been meaning to explore recently and haven’t got around to yet, which is part of Patrick’s question, is whether training our CELTA trainees or asking our own students ourselves to approach texts through gist and then detailed tasks (as I do everyday at the moment) is a valid way of teaching reading.
I have long advocated authentic tasks as being more important and relevant than ‘authentic’ texts, but would like to question further how authentic gist tasks are/can be and ditto detailed reading tasks. Shouldn’t we be encouraging our trainees and students to be approaching texts in the way we do in our L1s? And how practical is this within the confines of a course book driven syllabus or a pre-service training course.
Reading the first paragraph of a course book article to decide whether or not we want to read the whole thing would be an authentic gist task (but what do we do when the answer is no?). But reading an article and choosing which is the best title for it wouldn’t be.
The problem with authenticity seems to be the lack of text quantity and therefore choice in course books, which surely leads to the need for more student-selected texts – i.e. they do the gist reading before they come to class, through choosing texts they want to read as a class and deciding what to do with them. This just leaves the other students in the class with an authentic task to do to engage with that text once it’s been selected. But it also creates many problems for training courses such as CELTA. Can anyone help me with my conundrum?
30112011
Hi Neil, don’t start me on coursebooks (!) but one reason why skimming and scanning tasks are so favoured may be that the texts in textbooks are NOT self-selected, and hence the only way to make them accessible and/or palatable is to treat them in a fairly superficial manner. And, after all, since many coursebook texts are superficial in terms of their content, the most logical approach to them might be that of the reader of the inflight magazine (to which coursebook texts bear an uncanny resemblance), i.e. the most cursory skim and flick.
As for your final question – maybe I’ll leave that one to the many pre-service trainers more experienced than I am who read this blog.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: 2011, blogging, comment, ELT, Reading, Students
Categories : Developing Teachers, My CPD and I, Printing Press